Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta essay. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta essay. Mostrar todas las entradas

miércoles, 29 de mayo de 2013

Essay(2)

New and last essay, honeys. Hope you enjoy :)

Alien iconography in Doctor Who (2005-present): a matter of fears and likes

            Doctor Who is well known for being one of the longest TV series broadcasted. Even after a break, it restarted in 2005 and kept being one of the greatest hits on the English television; its episodes always develop unpredictable plots and have shown us all kind of creatures through time and space. We might think this is a question of imagination and luck, but we would be simplifying the scriptwriter job; if we keep on watching it and it’s still able to make us feel anything (fun, love, fear, sorrow) it’s because its writers know very well how to play with our minds. I don’t mean they are trying to drive us crazy (although sometimes it looks like that), but they certainly know well how to make the crowd sympathize or fear somebody.
            In the first place, we have the Doctor, the main character that defines himself as a mad man with a box. He is a time lord, an alien race that looks completely human, feels like a human and, in fact, as far as we know, has a life circle quite similar to humans in the beginning: through many episodes, the Doctor gives hints about how Gallyfreyan kids are born and raised, quite similarly to us. A time lord seems to be pretty normal to us, they are made time lords by spending a huge time looking into the Untempered Schism, which shows the entirety of the Time Vortex and the power that time lords have and that’s the point in which they differ from humans. They have achieved immortality by regenerating themselves when their bodies are too damaged, and immortality has always been one of the greatest ambitions for Humanity, so even that makes him attractive for us.
He has a thing for the Earth and humans in general (“Oh, humans, I thought I’d never get done saving you.”) and carries a human or at least half-human companion with him. He’s the last one of his species, completely free to come and go, but he still keeps a clear moral that pictures the virtues our society defends: kindness, peace, knowledge, courage, love... The only thing that can put him away from actual humans is the fact that he has two hearts and is about one thousand years old; he is eccentric and childish, indeed none of this makes him disgusting to any human he meets; instead, it makes the public feel some kind of tenderness because in so many aspects he is like a child: innocent, and innocence is something that must be protected. Here we can see the clearest example of how well scriptwriters know the public. It is always easier to make us sympathize with an alien creature as long as it is friendly and human-like.
Then we have the other main alien races: daleks, cybermen, weeping angels, silences, oods and silurians represent a wide range of possibilities, from fears to social conflicts, and their physical forms help to deepen into them. It’s not only about if they are ugly or nice (though this is important), but also about how sometimes something that looks harmless can become quite dangerous and take us unaware. Is it a metaphor of life? Maybe.
We could talk about daleks and cybermen jointly, as far as both of them represent different forms of the cyborg idea: daleks are a super intelligent alien race set into machines that make them letal, cybermen are steel men created by a human mind that use the heads of people as their organic component. Both of them have faced the Doctor a few times (daleks are, in fact, time lords’ biggest enemies and responsible for time lord’s extinction), always trying to take over the Earth and use humans to create more of them (cybermen) or destroy Humanity to get a new place to live in (daleks). Daleks seem to be way more dangerous because of their intelligence and lack of feelings. They are cold hyperrational creatures, unable of any empathy, although they haven’t always been like that; we know they were better once and compare it to what they’ve become and maybe spot our own future. If we only observe their appearance, we have to admit they don’t really look terrifying (“Without your gun you're a tricycle with a roof.” says the Doctor in episode 7x01) and they continuously claim they want to “Exterminate!” so there’s no possible doubt about their intentions. What makes them terrifying? Their history. They were like us once, but their whishes of improving themselves drove them into the complete loss of any kind of feeling, turning them into heartless brains. On the other hand, we have the cybermen, whose only interest is multiply their number so they can take over the Earth because their creator (originally human) compelled them to do so. Here we can see both sides of the same coin: with our continue struggle to be better, stronger, cleverer, we may end up being like daleks or cybermen (that depends on if we keep on thinking by ourselves or if we let someone else, more powerful or smarter, manipulate us). Will we go as far as this? Are we already going by developing things like eugenics, bionic devices, robots or even Google glasses? Those two aliens symbolize (very extreme) possibilities of future for us and are supposed to make us wonder about the morals that should be developed beside scientific achievements.
The weeping angels have turned out to be one of the creepiest aliens created by the Doctor Who scriptwriters. Opposed to daleks and cybermen, weeping angels appear for the first time on season 3 of the modern series and their origin is still uncertain. Many theories develop the idea of them being time lords that have fallen in disgrace, but their creator (Steven Moffat) hasn’t agreed with that. The only thing we know about their origin is that they are old, really old, older than our world, and that they definitely come from another part of the Universe. If we judge by their looks, we might think they are not very scary: weeping angels seem to be statues portraying angels with their eyes covered as if they were crying (in following episodes we find out that almost any statue can be one of them, regardless of their form), though later we discover the real reason why they don’t look straight: as long as somebody is looking at them, they cannot move, so they don’t risk to look into each other because that would doom them forever. The problem is that they are quick, very quick, and blinking may mean your death, because their touch will send you backwards in time to let them feed on your temporal energy. The only way to keep them from attacking you is to stare constantly at them, otherwise they’ll send you back in time again and again until no temporal energy is left in you and you die. The motto “Don’t blink” the Doctor repeats in every weeping angel episode has become one of the scariest sentences according to the fans.
The weeping angels represent psychological fears, much more personal than the previous ones. Scriptwriters are now playing with a few different fears: on one hand, fear of wasting time and dying without living at all, on the other hand, fear of the possibility of living creatures among us and being observed without us knowing it (they are literally living stone). The last one could be included in the list of paranoids that we can find among science fiction works. Besides, weeping angels in all kind of variations have always being a symbol of death, a very common one during World War I, when they got very popular to decorate the tombs of the fallen ones.
            Right next to the weeping angels, we may analyze silences. Again we find a new alien race that appears for the first time in the modern series and that plays with our minds in a very similar way. Silences’ main characteristic is that you only remember them as long as you are looking at them. How can humans possibly fight invaders that cannot even be remembered? And it’s not only them what you forget, but also anything that might be said or done while you’re seeing them, although it leaves traces in your mind that might let you remind the shadow of an idea, as if it were your own (a very subtle way of brainwashing, so to call it). Without our memories, we are in constant danger and don’t know it and they are stealing little parts of ourselves. They confess to have been ruling the world for centuries, manipulating and controlling people into their whishes. Right next to this kind of behavior, another question is raised: are we still ourselves without our memories or induced into somebody else’s wishes? Leaving aside the fact of the alien invasion, here the show plays with another fear that has become very common in the last twenty years because of the increase of Alzheimer disease; how can we fight an invisible enemy?
            Oods raise a very different situation. They are not enemies of the human race (or time lords), they a pacific and kind of child-like alien race who’s been born to serve. They need to have somebody telling them what to do, otherwise they pine away and die; they are also born with their brains out of their heads, so they must be pacific. They are one of the most confusing races in the show, because their exterior look is humanoid but they have tentacles on their faces and that, most of the times, bring the Doctor’s companions to mistake when they thing oods are dangerous. Oods also possess a high sensibility, they have a telepathic bound among their race and can express their pity by singing. Are they really inferior to human or equal but have developed their capabilities in a different way? I mean, humans develop intelligence and rationality more than anything else, but oods may have done the same with their empathy: they feel happy when the people around is happy, so they want to help and that is translated for humans as a way of servilism. Do we have the right to treat them as slaves?
            Here we can see a parallelism with most of the colonizations in History, like when Spanish people arrived to America for the first time: at the beginning, natives only wanted to be kind and then we took advantage on that. Is it the same with the oods? Rose Tyler (first Doctor’s companion in the new series) is kind of suspicious about the way humans understand and treat oods. When oods appear in the series again, Donna Noble (new companion) also gets astonished of how cruel humans can be with them; at this point, we get to see how oods may not be violent but they really know how to take care of themselves, contrary to the idea exposed by humans. They serve because they want and humans end up paying them with cruelty.
            Finally, we have the silurians. Silurians set a very different situation: they are not aliens, we are. They are a race that was habiting the Earth years and years before humans appeared and when we did, they found themselves forced to go into the planet to be able to keep on living. That’s why they start being really aggressive when we first meet them and then turn out to be a very human-like race willing to negotiate with us about the possibility of going back to the Earth surface. I think the circumstances around this encounter are quite interesting for us, because they are represented as humanoid lizards and that’s supposed to creep us, but when you really come to think about it, they are nothing but the previous step right before us. We are creepy for them too (one of them openly says so) because we are for them the same as some posthuman possibilities are for us. Both races are just two different steps of Evolution and, in this case, we are the invaders, we are the aliens and it’s our iconography the one that is disgusting.
            Apart from these main cases, there are a few more I’d like to talk about too. In first instance, Cassandra[1]. Cassandra is, at some point of the future, the last human being, although there’s almost nothing about her that we could recognize as human; her vanity has made her put herself through so many different types of plastic surgery that the only remaining part of her is a piece of plain skin with eyes and mouth. This could be considered as a posthuman possibility: no improvement that we can recognize, just the (very extreme) result of a very common obsession nowadays.
Right next to her, and as another way of going for humans, we have the Nestene duplicate[2] of Rory (one of the Doctor’s companion): it’s a plastic version of a human whose personality stays just like the original one and doesn’t know that it’s a robot, but finds out when the main software makes all the duplicates start to kill and he accidentally shoots his girlfriend Amy. It’s such a perfect copy that nobody around him knows he isn’t real, not even himself, and this could fit the paranoia theme of classic science fiction.
            Sontarans[3] are a very clear (and critic) representation of another popular fact of scientific progress: eugenics and cloning. This race is meant to be warriors, pure warriors: they are born with the fighting desire inside and it’s not specifically said how they reproduce, but since they do it by millions with the only intention of being part of a huge army and they are “born” directly as grownups, we can imagine that they don’t do it the traditional way.
            Vashta Nerada[4] is a very different type of alien race. They look like dust particles when you see them floating around in the air thanks to sunshine, but they usually gather compounding huge shadows to attack people. They are also known as air piranhas, because they eat any kind of flesh just like the marabunta would. Actually, I see them more like marabunta than piranhas (here we have another buglike type of alien, but also some kind of psychological fear representation: shadows, the darkness and what is in there that we can’t see). The only way of staying safe from them is always to keep an eye on the shadows. The second scariest motto created by Doctor Who is “Count the shadows”, referring to this alien.
            Human perspective could be our conclusion since we are all human (or so I hope). Generally speaking, the first reaction of humans (unless you’ve already travelled with the Doctor for so long that very few things can really impress you) is to feel scared. That’s a very normal reaction when you’re facing something unknown and that doesn’t look like anything you’ve seen before, but most of the times if we still feel scared after a while is because we can recognize a part of humanity in it, usually the worst part. If we watch alien invasions, wars or behaviors we can conclude that they do not look so different from us, although it looked like that at the beginning. Playing with the looks is the simplest way of scaring the audience and it may work on a concrete group (like the youngest spectators), but what scriptwriters do to really frighten grownups is to go one step beyond and create aliens that represent deeper fears or possible evolutions, those which are terrifying because they attack directly the most basic instinct: survival, by not letting us perceive reality as it is actually, or because they show how we are developing a hyper rational way of thinking and taking advance on whatever surrounds us.



[1] Doctor Who (2005-present) episodes 1x02 and 2x01.
[2] Doctor Who (2005-present) episodes 5x12 and 5x13.
[3] Doctor Who (2005-present) episodes 4x04 and 4x05.
[4] Doctor Who (2005-present) episodes 4x08 and 4x09.

martes, 19 de febrero de 2013

SciFi essay

Hi, I know, I'm writing in English! That's new. And I'm not bringing a new episode of this eccentric year abroad, that's new too. No, I'm bringing you my essay. Nobody gives a fuck, I know, but while I was writing it I found out that there wasn't much information about this, so I'm posting it just in case that anybody else turns out to find themselves in same situation.
Here you have a comparative essay between The Hunger Games and Ender's Game. Hope you like it.
I'm such a freak, I know.
Love.


Childhood in a post-apocalyptic world
            Growing up in the normal world is already a hard task, but doing it with a post-apocalyptic background just stinks. The apocalypse changes people, that’s unavoidable; when there’s nothing left but a bunch of ruins and the survivors have to work harder than ever to live one more day in a hostile environment, the good old uses that we used to know have nothing to do there anymore. Grown-ups can stand it, but children are usually a collateral damage. Suddenly, they find themselves lost in a completely new world where they might not even have parents to take care of them, and they have to get used to it quickly if they want to survive. Even if they still have a family and a place to live in, they just have to accept that times have changed and it’s rarely for good.
            Ender’s game and The hunger games display very different points of view of what childhood in a post-apocalyptic world can be, but they share a common topic: how to exploit one of the most prolific resources they have, childhood. Children imply innocence, creativity, energy, but also a weak spot in society, something that, by instinct, must be protected by adults. In both novels we can see how the powerful and important people use all of this as a means to an end.
            In both novels there’s been a war, but the worlds are different: Ender lives in an intergalactic world where the humans have defeated twice, with a great effort, an alien race that they barely understand; on the other hand, Katniss lives in a devastated but not so-far-from-us North America where there has been a civil war among humans that has ended up by dividing the territory in twelve districts ruled by the main city, the Capitol, where the winners live their rich and wonderful lives, without minding the poverty and misery that prevail in the districts.
            Obviously, these two different depictions of the end of a war set two completely different worlds to live in and, of course, children are not seen the same way. Once we’ve spent a few pages with Ender and Katniss, we can see that their lives are totally different, but by the end of the books we may establish some coincidences between them. Ender is a genius, he is extraordinary and that’s what will drive him to the top, his life is also way better in most of the senses: he has a family, he studies, he has fun in his own way, his life is way more normal than Katniss’. She is a normal girl (given the circumstances) who lives her own day-a-day war: her father has died, so she has to hunt to feed her mother and little sister, which is actually illegal, and doesn’t attend school anymore. There’s nothing remarkable in her, she’s just a survivor, as many others around her (her best friend also hunts to feed his family, so we can see that not even this is extraordinary).
            For both characters there’s a turning point: Ender leaves to go to a special school where he will be trained for war, to keep on defending the Earth from possible alien invasions, and it’s there where he will show all his potential and how talented he is, which will mean success and, consequently, his innocence and childish spirit will be taken from him little by little. By the end of the book, we’ll see that there’s nothing left of that kid that got into the academy in the beginning. In The hunger games, Katniss is already 16, which means that she has been sorted to take part in The Hunger Games for the last four years, but now her sister is chosen and, to save her, she will volunteer to do exactly the thing that has been scaring her and every kid around since they turned twelve. We can see that, while this turning point means something good for Ender, at least partly because he will have the chance to learn and develop his extraordinary skills and intelligence, for Katniss it is almost a death sentence, but she faces it with determination just to protect her family. In both cases, even though they are way too different, we witness how these two characters grow up, leaving childhood behind, and this is another important spot: how circumstances force the children to mature faster and earlier than we do nowadays.
            Besides this, we can see what childhood actually means for people: in Ender’s game, children are possible future soldiers and strategists that might help defending the planet from the evil creatures outside and this is taken so far that they even stop caring about children’s humanity anymore. Thanks to their imagination, intelligence and non-corrupted-yet minds, they are powerful foes for the possible invaders, because kids don’t think the same way adults do. It’s true that the Government takes them away from their families, but at least they receive some kind of instruction, although they are sent to the battle afterwards, they are not completely defenseless; also, the reason why the kids are brought away from their homes is sold as reasonable: they are getting prepared to fight for their world, their people. In The hunger games, children are seen as a tool, a way to manipulate the people and remind them that the Government has the power and the control so far that they can even take their daughters and sons to death just to entertain the population. By the end of the book, Katniss is considered as a threaten by the Government and a revolutionary sign by the people, and this is will rule her life from now on, she will be the sign of revolution. These points of view may seem different at first, but actually everything can be reduced to how children are seen only as a weapon, as much for war as for peace.
            Besides this, we can also check another important thing: the training. As I said before, Ender and his mates are trained, taught and instructed, they are not just sent to fight without any weapon. If some kids prove to be extraordinary in any sense, as Ender is, their skills are developed and admired, people can see something good in them. In Katniss’ world they don’t; she proves to be a great archer, but the only way she had to train was illegal and neither the Capitolium nor the peace agents that are supposed to keep the peace in the districts would have seen anything good in that. Indeed it is considered as dangerous, because she’s able to defend herself from attackers and that gives her some kind of power. When she arrives to the Games and proves to be an excellent hunter, people are amazed, but not the organizers nor the watchers: they turn to be worried, because she has obviously learnt on her own and, since she comes from a poor district, she might turn out to be a problem.
            Some quotes in the books can also help us to understand the kind of moral and mentality people have. On one hand, we have the famous “Sometimes lies are more dependable than the truth” (Ender’s game), which I think it’s very illustrative; it makes us think about a society so corrupted in certain ways that the truth might mean nothing, so it’s not a surprise that kids are used as potential weapons in a war. Ender doesn’t trust anybody and adults, and especially teachers, are just a bunch of liars. It also submits the idea of how easy it is sometimes to find out the truth just by the contrary meaning of the lie (as when adults say “It won’t hurt” and you know perfectly well by it that it will). On the other hand, we have the repeated “And may the odds be ever in your favor” (The Hunger Games), which I find quite ironic if not irritating; this is the Hunger Games slogan, so to say, and every time children are selected to take part in the Games, this is the common thing to say; I think this is really ironic, because as they are “wishing” luck to the participants, what they are really looking forward to is a blood bath, and we can witness Katniss and some of her friends using it in a mocking way sometimes.
            Can we see some similarity between books and reality? Yes, we can, but we have to go a few hundreds years back in time. The way kids are trained and sent to the battlefield might be compared to the Ancient Greek and how Spartans raised their children:
In ancient Sparta, boys at aged seven years old left their homes and entered the public educational system. The goal of this system of education was to produce a well-drilled military machine composed of soldiers who were "obedient to the word of command, capable of enduring hardships and victories in battle.
The Spartan system of education was organized by the state and each boy was assigned to a group known as the agela. They lived in a communal style and were made to undergo a curriculum of training that was rigorous and often painful. Enormous discipline was placed on these children as they passed through the hands of teachers, gymnastic coaches and military instructors. The goal of this program was to produce men who were not only physically fit but psychologically disciplined. The Spartan male's education did not end till he reached the age of thirty. In this educational regime, literacy and the arts were not a priority.[1]
            We can also compare The Hunger Games system to the Ancient Rome and their ways of entertainment. Even the name of the space where the competition takes places is the same, arena, and everybody could attend it and watch. Children were taken there to witness the spectacle, not caring that it was extremely violent, and children that remain at home are compelled to watch THG on television as everyone else. Besides, kids are sent to fight as if they were war prisoners (aren’t they in fact?), anything can be sent by the watchers to attack them and make the show more interesting for people, and there’s a great variety of weapons set in the arena for them to use it besides the natural resources the participants can find in their displayed environment:
The majority of gladiators was either condemned criminals, slaves, prisoners of war or volunteers who signed up to do shows for a fee (…).
Various other weapons, women, and sometimes even dwarves were used in the games. Special types of "wild animal matches" (venationes) were introduced in the 2nd Century BC and became very popular. Such bouts included men on foot and on horseback, known as beastiarii, who were usually either criminals, prisoners of war, or trained and paid fighters. Beastiarii fought exotic animals, which eventually led to an extensive trade market.[2]
            All this factors have repercussions in the way Ender and Katniss understand their lives.
            In the beginning, we see that Ender is a very cultured person; he and his sister spend their time thinking about questions that not even the adults have in their minds and they start a philosophic revolution by exposing their conclusions where people can read and discuss them. It’s obvious, then, that, although they are kids, they already have some kind of maturity, a different way of seeing things and, of course, enough courage to put them to the test. Ender develops his skills in order to help his planet, but there’s a consequence that nobody has expected, although it could have been predictable just by checking his personal character, and that he explains it quite well in one quote: In the moment when I truly understand my enemy, understand him well enough to defeat him, then in that very moment I also love him. Those who trained him to turn him into a very effective weapon didn’t count on that and this is what will help Ender to keep his humanity. His newly evolved compassion will be a very important factor for the rest of his life and will change things that weren’t meant to change. His sensibility will help him understand a lot more about his mission or how to accomplish it in a different way than expected.
            Katniss evolution is a bit different. She’s introduced as an orphan fighter in the day-a-day. She has no time to philosophize about life nor war, she takes care of her family and silently begs for not being chosen to die in the Games (nor any of her beloved ones); actually, the only big thought that she transmits is how bad and cruel the Games are. However, by the time her sister is selected she volunteers, which shows us that she is not a kid anymore (at least not completely), because she has already developed that instinct grown-ups have about protecting the younger ones beyond the instinctive fear of dying. Although she tries to look tough and strong, along the story she shows a big compassion and even some kind of maternal instinct (anyway, she says she will never have children so she won’t have to put them through the annual torture of the Games her generation has to face), not just with humans but also with the animals she hunts (at some point, she says that she prefers to kill them quickly). But by the end of the Games, her toughness has started to become real; killing, almost being killed, seeing people dying and knowing that she will never be able to have a normal in-love relationship make her turn into an adult suffocated by responsibilities. That toughness she develops will be necessary and important in the next books, when she will become the face of the revolution and have to face a real war.
            I think we can conclude that Ender and Katniss live in quite diverse worlds but represent not so different perspectives. What they really show us is that it doesn’t matter how sick the environment can be around us as long as we know who we want to be; you might be forced to fight and kill, but you have to understand why and at some point, as Peeta says to Katniss before the Games start, Only I keep wishing I could think of a way to... to show the Capitol they don't own me. That I'm more than just a piece in their Games. The evolution from children to adults, their relationships and thoughts in these concrete post-apocalyptic situations help us by exploring parts of human behavior that would be taboo in any other circumstances. It’s evident that kids, their minds and lives, are the best weapons society can have, and that an event like the apocalypse can distort our ethics about it, but are these kinds of  approaches a warning for the future or a way to put the present to the test? In my opinion, authors always try to tell us more about the present than the future, so maybe we should start questioning ourselves.